TOWN OF EAST WINDSOR
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
INLAND/WETLANDS WATERCOURSE AGENCY
Regular Meeting
December 2, 2009
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ceppetelli called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Town Hall Meeting Room, 11 Rye Street, Broad Brook, CT.
ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM:
Present: Regular Members Michael Ceppetelli (Chairman), Michael
Koczera, John Malin, Richard Osborn, Michael Sawka, Ron Savaria, Robert Slate, and Alternate Members Alan Baker, and Kathryn Roloff.
Unable to Attend: New member appointed 12/1/2009 (apparently not yet sworn in) .
Chairman Ceppetelli noted the establishment of a quorum with seven Regular Members and two Alternates members. Chairman Ceppetelli reported the Regular Members will be voting on Items of Business this evening. Also present was Wetlands Agent Newton.
LET THE RECORD SHOW Selectman Richard Pippin, the Board of Selectmen’s liaison to this Commission, was in attendance, as was Dale Nelson, resident. Kathy Pippin, of the Board of Finance, arrived at approximately 8:00 p.m.
AGENDA ADDITIONS:
MOTION: To ADD TO THE AGENDA the following: under STATUS REPORTS: Discussion of 68 Newberry Road, and under GENERAL BOARD DISCUSSION: Enforcement Options.
Koczera moved/Slate seconded/
VOTE: In Favor: Unanimous (Ceppetelli/Koczera/Malin/Osborn/Sawka/Savaria/Slate)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 11/4/09:
MOTION: To APPROVE the Minutes of Regular Meeting dated November 4, 2009, with the following AMENDMENTS: PAGE 3, MISCELLANEOUS/a) Vote on Adoption of 2010 Meeting Schedule, line #95, “appeal timeframe it would enable the Commission to near HEAR the application on the second ......”; PAGE 7, STATUS REPORTS/1) 68 Newberry Road-Cease and Desist Status Update, line 316: “.....Cease & Desist so it wouldn’t stop him (Mr. Dearborn) from being being able to...........”; PAGE 9, same item of business, line 400: “submitted; there is ARE open violation VIOLATIONS, the broken trust is an issue.”
Koczera moved/Osborn seconded/
VOTE:In Favor: Unanimous (Koczera/Osborn/Savaria/Slate)
Opposed: No one
Abstained: Ceppetelli/Malin/Sawka
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING (on Inland Wetland applications): None
NEW PUBLIC HEARING (on Inland Wetlands applications): None
CONTINUED APPLICATIONS OR BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS: None
NEW APPLICATIONS TO BE RECEIVED: None
MISCELLANEOUS/a) Discussion of 2010 Meeting Schedule:
Chairman Ceppetelli noted that the Commission adopted a once a month meeting schedule the previous month. He understood that there had been a request from the Board of Selectmen and Staff that the Board consider meeting twice a month. Commissioner Koczera pointed out that there is very little business on the Agenda this evening. Commissioner Osborn and Chairman Ceppetelli suggested additional meetings could be scheduled as necessary. Commissioner Savaria suggested if the Commission agreed to go to two meetings a month there should a also be a stipulation for an additional appropriation for secretarial services. Commissioner Baker agreed to two meetings a month during construction season to get applications done in a timely fashion but the Commission needs a professional recorder for its
meetings. Commissioner Sawka questioned the need for additional meetings? He suggested things will never be the same for two to three years due to serious money problems; he didn’t feel the Commission will see that many applications. Commissioner Sawka suggested the Commission wait six months and discuss an expanded schedule again. Commissioner Roloff agreed to schedule additional meetings as needed.
Wetlands Agent Newton reported one of the big perceptions/misconceptions was that the Board of Selectmen received notice that the Board doesn’t move things forward quickly enough but the Board could receive new applications and discuss them the same night they are received. If changes need to be made or additional information provided the applicant has that month to prepare the application properly for presentation at the next meeting at which time the application can be acted on. Chairman Ceppetelli suggested the burden falls on the applicant to be prepared and have the material to Staff and the Board before the meeting; it’s not realistic for Wetlands Agent Newton and Town Engineer Norton to review material during a meeting. Wetlands Agent Newton reported that applications are
automatically received statutorily; the Board doesn’t actually need to physically receive them at a meeting. She felt it would be to everyone’s advantage for the Board to review the applications and determine if the application is complete. Wetlands Agent Newton reported this process wouldn’t be applicable to Public Hearings, but would be beneficial for applications such as the previous two lot subdivision on Winkler Road where additional information was requested during the presentation process. Chairman Ceppetelli also noted that everyone who serves on the Board is open to assistance when working with an applicant if that applicant needs to expedite the application process, and makes that need known to the Board or Staff.
The Commission decided to keep the one meeting per month meeting schedule and consider additional meetings as necessary.
MISCELLANEOUS/b) Election of Officers:
Chairman Ceppetelli noted the current slate of officers is himself as Chairman, Richard Osborn as Vice Chairman, and John Malin as Secretary. He questioned if any of the current officers are unwilling to be nominated again; no one voiced opposition. Chairman Ceppetelli questioned if any other regular members were interested in serving as officers, noting Alternate Members are not eligible for these positions under the Commission’s bylaws. No one else expressed an interest to be nominated. Commissioner Roloff suggested she was happy with the current slate. Commissioner Savaria concurred, noting he felt the current officers had the right temperaments and personalities for the positions.
MOTION: To NOMINATE Michael Ceppetelli as Chairman, Richard Osborn as Vice Chairman, and John Malin as Secretary.
Savaria moved/Slate seconded/
VOTE:In Favor: Unanimous (Koczera/Sawka/Savaria/Slate
Opposed: No one
Abstained: Ceppetelli/Malin/Osborn
AGENT DECISIONS: None
VIOLATIONS: None
STATUS REPORTS/68 Newberry Road:
Wetlands Agent Newton submitted to the Board a copy of an e-mail which she generated to the Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) requesting their agreement for Steve Dearborn to resolve the issues related to his violation with the Town. Wetlands Agent Newton reported that the ACOE has agreed to allow Steve Dearborn to perform that work, with oversight by the Town. She noted this allows the Town to seek compliance to its Violation Notice. Wetlands Agent Newton reported the ACOE has concerns regarding multiple areas of the 68 Newberry Road property, while the Town has only one Inland/Wetlands issue.
Commissioner Koczera noted he heard from an old timer in town that Wilcox graded his property without permission, and that the water had originally gone away from Steve Dearborn’s property. Wetlands Agent Newton noted there is no history on that issue; all activity initiated by (Gerry) Wilcox is permitted. Commissioner Koczera suggested he raised the issue because the Commission needs to be cognizant that people could be working without permits, and that that work may affect neighbors; that’s the reason the Commission supports the laws, and is the reason for the application process, which allows the Commission to review the work up front and determine if the grading would affect someone else. Chairman Ceppetelli concurred, noting Commissioner Osborn has been left with a huge
puddle in his front yard which shouldn’t be there but has been caused by a grading issue on a nearby property. Wetlands Agent Newton noted the Inland/Wetlands Commission has the ability to advise the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) of situations which they should consider when an application reaches the PZC level. While an issue might not be technically an Inland/Wetlands issue this Board is the first set of eyes to see an application; any information beneficial to the PZC can be put in a report to them.
Wetlands Agent Newton reported the some of the issues at 68 Newberry Road have been going on for 2 years, with no resolution. She offered the Commission a memo of options. Wetlands Agent Newton reiterated the farm road was installed without a permit, although a part of the farm road was later permitted as a regulated activity. The farm road also falls under the ACOE’s jurisdiction; if this Commission wants the farm road removed it must revoke the permit under which it was permitted. Wetlands Agent Newton suggested the plan which will be submitted to the PZC will remove the farm road, but this Commission must revoke its permit. An individual can not fill to create a road in a wetlands; that’s not a farming exemption.
Commissioner Koczera felt the State Statutes say the Commission must give an exemption to get to the other side of the farm pond. Wetlands Agent Newton reiterated that an individual can’t put fill in an upland review area. A farm pond is an exemption in wetlands provided the Board says it’s a farming exemption; the decision is at the Board’s discretion. Wetlands Agent Newton referenced an earlier guide she provided to the Commission regarding options for permitting farm exemptions. She indicated the farm road was permitted by this Board; the ACOE will require removal of the farm road but this Board must revoke its permit.
Chairman Ceppetelli questioned if the farm road is contributing to run off to the adjacent landowner? Wetlands Agent Newton replied affirmatively, noting the drainage is blocked by the fill. Commissioner Savaria questioned that Steve Dearborn’s representatives said at the last meeting that they planned to take the road out? Wetlands Agent Newton replied affirmatively, but reiterated the technical way to deal with this issue is to revoke the permit.
With regard to the farm pond, Wetlands Agent Newton reiterated it’s not been completed, and isn’t being used as a farm pond, and it can’t be used as a farm pond because it’s not an exemption for the ACOE; she expects Steve Dearborn will have to fill it in. While this Board granted a permit, it’s the ACOE that will deal with the farm pond. Wetlands Agent Newton noted she wasn’t employed by East Windsor at the time the farm exemption was granted but she read the minutes of the meetings, and she doesn’t know how the exemption was given. The process provides for the Commission to ask questions, and get information from the applicant; that didn’t appear to have happened. Wetlands Agent Newton reported approximately 18,000 square feet of fill went in
the upland review area. The Inland/Wetlands Commission issued a Violation Notice in November, 2008, additional fill was added and millings had been added as well, the barriers that were displaced earlier have been put back in place. She reiterated the Commission should issue an Order, with a reasonable timeframe; work should be done by a licensed contractor. She would also recommend some other structure be installed other than “mafia” blocks. The fill can be removed now, and the seeding can be done in the Spring.
Wetlands Agent Newton reported the Inland/Wetlands Commission has issued a Cease & Desist Order because of illegal and non-permitted activities and conditions that were not followed. Steve Dearborn won’t do anything to resolve the issues; he won’t let anyone on his property. These are not difficult things for which to reach compliance; it’s been 2 years and nothing has been done. The Commission should revoke Steve Dearborn’s Permit, and issue an Order to remove the fill with a reasonable timeframe which isn’t negotiable. Should those actions fail the Commission can seek an injunction in Court. An alternative remedy would be to do a CEPA intervention through the DEP.
Commissioner Koczera questioned the Commission’s ability to close down Steve Dearborn’s operations until he complies? Wetlands Agent Newton replied affirmatively but felt Steve Dearborn wouldn’t comply with that either. She felt the Permit revocation was a better option, but noted the Commission must be specific as to what actions it wants to occur as the court will only give an injunction on what the Commission asked for. A Show Cause Hearing must also occur, which would take place in January with the violator appearing before the Commission.
Commissioner Koczera noted tree removal equipment parked on this property. Wetlands Agent Newton reported Steve Dearborn is allowing ABC Tree Company, which is a firm cutting down and trimming trees along roads in town, to store their equipment at this location. Commissioner Koczera suggested he brought the question up because Steve Dearborn is asking for a farm but it looks like he’s operating a different business there.
Wetlands Agent Newton reported that the plans submitted originally never showed a pre-fill elevation, but it should match the elevation of the adjacent property. She has talked to Steve Dearborn’s staff, they both agree that approximately 3’ to 4’ of fill has been put in there. Wetlands Agent Newton reported they need to do a plan but have not been allowed to go on the site. Commissioner Savaria queried that at the previous meeting they talked about putting in a berm; he questioned if they still intended to do that? Wetlands Agent Newton reported that involved a Zoning issue. They talked about showing an existing and a future plan, which would include future potential expansion. To her knowledge they were going to come in with a plan to expand the
corn field. Millings have been placed adjacent to the wetlands; the swale was to prevent the millings from going into the wetlands and the berm was a double method of prevention. Wetlands Agent Newton reported that plan hasn’t come through; it was just discussion during the previous meeting.
Chairman Ceppetelli summarized that Wetlands Agent Newton was recommending revocation of the existing Permit for the farm road and removal of the fill for the farm road. He questioned the Commission’s preference.
MOTION ONE: To REVOKE FARM ROAD PERMIT AND ORDER REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING PORTION OF THE FARM ROAD WITH THE ORIGINAL AREA BEING PLACED BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL GRADE.
Osborn moved/Slate seconded/
Discussion: Commissioner Koczera questioned that Steve Dearborn’s surveyor was supposed to come back with a plan; he would like the motion to reflect that the revocation was occurring, in part, because of the lack of filing a plan. Wetlands Agent Newton reported Steve Dearborn’s surveyor hasn’t been allowed back on the property to do the work to file the plan; the letter which will accompany the Notice of Revocation will indicate that the Commission has revoked permit #(later identified as 1406) for the farm road because of the following reasons.........
Commissioner Roloff questioned where the fill being removed from the farm road will go? Wetlands Agent Newton reported the permit given for the filling was an After-the-Fact Permit as the filling occurred prior to Steve Dearborn appearing for a permit. No one knows where the fill came from, but it isn’t clean fill. Commissioner Koczera suggested the fill contains blacktop, etc. The Commission felt the fill should be removed off site.
AMENDMENT ONE TO MOTION ONE: THAT THE FILL REMOVED FROM THE FARM ROAD SHALL BE TAKEN OFF SITE.
Osborn moved the amendment/Slate seconded the amendment/
Discussion: Commissioner Roloff questioned the need for a timeframe for the work to be completed? Wetlands Agent Newton felt a timeframe would be appropriate, as Inland/Wetlands Permits are good for five (5) years and anyone can start the work at any time if a specific timeframe isn’t dictated. Chairman Ceppetelli questioned Commissioner Sawka for a reasonable timeframe for the intended work? Commissioner Sawka suggested if Steve Dearborn used a couple of trucks and an excavator the amount of fill in question could be removed in a couple of days. The Commission and Wetlands Agent Newton agreed a timeframe of a month would be realistic.
AMENDMENT TWO TO MOTION ONE: WITH WORK TO COMMENCE ON JANUARY 15, 2010 AND CONCLUDE BY FEBRUARY 15, 2010.
Osborn moved the amendment/Slate seconded the amendment/
Discussion: Chairman Ceppetelli queried the Commission for their preference for Steve Dearborn to do this work himself, or if a third party professional should be required? Commissioner Koczera questioned if a bond would be required of Steve Dearborn? Wetlands Agent Newton felt Steve Dearborn wouldn’t comply with the requirement for posting a bond; if the Town called the bond she felt Steve Dearborn wouldn’t allow another professional on the site to do the work. At that point there would be a court injunction to seek resolution. Wetlands Agent Newton noted that part of this process is a Show Cause Hearing which will occur in January at which time Steve Dearborn may be able to provide evidence that he is in compliance. Commissioner Koczera suggested Steve
Dearborn won’t pick up a Certified Mailing of the Notice of Revocation; the Notice should be served by a sheriff. The Commission concurred.
AMENDED MOTION ONE: To REVOKE FARM ROAD PERMIT AND ORDER REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING PORTION OF THE FARM ROAD, FILL REMOVED FROM THE FARM ROAD SHALL BE TAKEN OFF SITE, AND WORK SHALL COMMENCE ON JANUARY 15, 2010 AND CONCLUDE BY FEBRUARY 15, 2010, AND THE ORIGINAL AREA SHALL BE PLACED BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL GRADE.
Osborn moved the amended motion/Slate seconded the amended motion/
VOTE: In Favor: Unanimous (Ceppetelli/Koczera/Malin/Osborn/Sawka/Savaria/Slate)
MOTION TWO: ISSUE AN ORDER FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE FILL THAT WAS PLACED TO THE NORTH OF THE POND AND RESTORATION OF THIS AREA BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL GRADE. ALSO, THAT THE AREA BE PLANTED WITH AN APPROPRIATE WETLAND SEED MIXTURE. CONDITIONS FOR REMOVAL SHOULD INCLUDED:
1) TIMEFRAME:
Discussion: Chairman Ceppetelli queried Commissioner Sawka for a recommendation for a timeframe for the return to grade for the 18,000 square feet of fill? Commissioner Sawka suggested that work could be completed within a week, plus or minus a day. Chairman Ceppetelli suggested giving Steve Dearborn an extra month; the Commission considered the seasonal conditions and set a timeframe for removal to commence February 15, 2010, and conclude April 15, 2010.
2) WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR:
Discussion: The Commission questioned if Steve Dearborn is a licensed, or registered, contractor? Would a third party contractor be preferable? Wetlands Agent Newton suggested that requirement was within the Commission’s right; the work which has been done by Steve Dearborn hasn’t been done correctly. The Commission has the right to request an “outside” contractor. The Commission requested that the removal work be completed by an outside registered or licensed contractor.
3) THAT A PERMANENT STRUCTURE BE PLACED WHERE THE JERSEY BARRIERS EXIST.
No discussion; the Commission concurred with the recommendation.
General Discussion: Commissioner Roloff questioned where this material will be put? Wetlands Agent Newton felt the material deposited came from the farm pond; it’s assumed it was mixed with off-site materials. She indicated she had asked David Askew (North Central Conservation District) to visit the site to review the conditions; Mr. Askew reported that once a wetlands has been excavated, because it’s not in its natural layers, it no longer acts as a wetlands. Mr. Askew suggested that it looked like this material has been mixed with other material. Wetlands Agent Newton indicated that the material is clean fill; it could be placed on the upland area of the site.
AMENDMENT ONE TO MOTION TWO: ALL GRADING OF EXCESS MATERIAL BE PLACED IN AN UPLAND AREA.
Osborn moved the amendment/Slate seconded the amendment/
General Discussion continued: Commissioner Koczera questioned the need for oversight of the work, perhaps by Town Engineer Norton? Commissioner Malin questioned if the Town went to court on this issue would the court specify a third party contractor? Wetlands Agent Newton replied affirmatively, but noted the need for the Commission to indicate that intent in its motion. The Commission agreed on an “approved” contractor.
AMENDMENT TWO TO MOTION TWO: TO REQUIRE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE EAST WINDSOR TOWN ENGINEER.
Osborn moved the amendment/Slate seconded the amendment.
AMENDED MOTION TWO: ISSUE AN ORDER FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE FILL THAT WAS PLACED TO THE NORTH OF THE POND AND RESTORATION OF THIS AREA BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL GRADE. ALSO, THAT THE AREA BE PLANTED WITH AN APPROPRIATE WETLAND SEED MIXTURE. CONDITIONS FOR REMOVAL SHOULD INCLUDED:
1) TIMEFRAME: removal to commence February 15, 2010, and conclude April 15, 2010.
2) WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR: removal work be completed by an outside registered or licensed contractor.
3) THAT A PERMANENT STRUCTURE BE PLACED WHERE THE JERSEY BARRIERS EXIST.
4) ALL GRADING OF EXCESS MATERIAL BE PLACED IN AN UPLAND AREA.
5) TO REQUIRE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE EAST WINDSOR TOWN ENGINEER.
Osborn moved amended Motion Two/Slate seconded amended Motion Two
VOTE:In Favor: Ceppetelli/Koczera/Osborn/Sawka/Savaria/Slate
Opposed: No one
Abstained: No one.
CONFERENCES/SEMINARS/TRAINING/1) Board Development - Training/Topics Schedule:
Nothing presented this evening.
CORRESPONDENCE: None.
GENERAL BOARD DISCUSSION:
Wetlands Agent Newton reported that the Board had recommended to the Board of Selectmen a Fines Ordinance, which ultimately went to Town Meeting. At the Town Meeting it was determined that the Fines Ordinance wasn’t the route to be taken. Another option available to the Commission would be pursuing penalties as provided for Inland/Wetlands under “Connecticut General Statute (CGS) Section 22a-4. Penalty. Court orders.”
Wetlands Agent Newton reported the Board has the right to record on the Land Records any Cease & Desist Order issued by the Board. She has conferred with the Town Attorney with regard to appropriate wording. The Cease & Desist Order will be recorded on the Land Records, the landowner will receive notice of the recording, and the recording will not be removed until compliance is reached. Chairman Ceppetelli suggested that most landowners have mortgages on their property, when something is filed it’s a way of notifying the bank that there is an issue with the property which the landowner might need to resolve with regard to mortgage conditions. Wetlands Agent Newton reported this action is commonly done for Inland/Wetlands issues; it’s spelled out specifically by the CGS. It’s also done for the Planning and Zoning Commission but it’s done under case law. This action doesn’t give immediate compliance but if someone wants to refinance a mortgage this could come up as an issue for
them.
Chairman Ceppetelli noted that while legal action is an option for the Commission historically the Town hasn’t followed that route. He questioned if the Board of Finance should be approached to add a line item for legal fees to the next fiscal budget? Commissioner Osborn felt that East Windsor bends over backwards to keep from going to court, therefore, people don’t comply with regulations; it’s an issue for the Commission. Chairman Ceppetelli queried options for passing that message on to the Board of Finance. Wetlands Agent Newton reported budget season is approaching; if it’s the consensus of the Commission to seek a line item for legal fees then a letter from the Board could be sent to the Board of Finance requesting serious consideration of the request. She noted
the Commission has previously sought to initiate a Fines Ordinance which addressed violations on a case by case basis, that ordinance was defeated twice. The court penalties are another option.
Commissioner Savaria favored the request for legal fees. Wetlands Agent Newton reported the legal fees would be used to hire a land use attorney who is already familiar with the CGS applicable to wetlands. Commissioners Savaria and Baker agreed to seek this line item, noting there is no incentive for people to comply with the regulations. Commissioner Roloff concurred that the Commission discussed the Fines Ordinance at length during previous meetings; if the townspeople want to bypass a Fines Ordinance then it leaves the Commission with the option of going to court. The consensus of the Commission was to request the addition of a line item for legal fees under the budget for the next fiscal year.
MOTION: To request Wetlands Agent Newton to draft a letter to the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Finance to request funding in the next fiscal year for special legal situations.
Osborn moved/Slate seconded/
Discussion: Commissioner Slate questioned if the Commission should specify an amount for the funding? Wetlands Agent Newton suggested court action for this Commission would require the assistance of a land use attorney who is already familiar with the Statutes applicable to wetlands; the attorney’s assistance would require review of the Commission’s file. Chairman Ceppetelli also noted that should the Town be successful in its suit all legal fees would be reimbursable by the violator.
AMENDMENT: To specify an amount of $10,000 for a line item applicable to legal fees.
Osborn moved the amendment/Slate seconded the amendment
AMENDED MOTION: To request Wetlands Agent Newton to draft a letter to the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Finance to request funding in an amount of $10,000 for a line item applicable to legal fees in the next fiscal year for the Inland/Wetlands Commission.
Osborn moved/Slate seconded/
VOTE:In Favor: Ceppetelli/Koczera/Osborn/Sawka/Savaria/Slate
Opposed: No one
Abstained: No one.
GENERAL BOARD DISCUSSION/1) Enforcement Options:
Wetlands Agent Newton reported that under the CEPA Statutes anyone can be a party as an Intervenor for a CEPA claim; the body can be an individual, a corporation, a board, they don’t even have to be a resident of East Windsor. This Inland/Wetlands Board could make a claim for unreasonable water pollution, etc. against a violator. The Board’s Staff would issue a Cease & Desist Order, and Staff can also request that the DEP initiate an injunction under the CEPA; often the DEP will do the claim under the Clean Water Act. The Board could also go to the Housing Court regarding zoning issues; the attorneys for the Housing Court would be willing to review the situation to determine if they could prosecute the violator for criminal charges. Wetlands Agent Newton reported this is
another option for the Board when dealing with difficult violations.
Wetlands Agent Newton had provided the Board with a reference guide regarding the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act regarding actions required of a Commission, its Commissioners, and staff providing a meeting record. Commissioner Koczera noted the reference material cited the actions of a Board member when speaking with the public. Wetlands Agent Newton cited court cases regarding such actions.
Wetlands Agent Newton advised the Board that she has been in contact with the DEP regarding the status of the outstanding violation at 244 South Main Street. They are currently in a holding pattern regarding the Order; DEP staff has gone from 15 employees to 5, and now they are down to 1. Wetlands Agent Newton reported the remedial work was to have been completed by May, 2009; it’s now December, 2009 and nothing has been started. She noted the Order is in place; the Commission needs to be diligent regarding compliance.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: To ADJOURN this Meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Sawka moved/Slate seconded/VOTE: In Favor: Unanimous
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________________________________________
Peg Hoffman, Recording Secretary, Conservation Commission/Inland Wetland Watercourse Agency
| 
